The Claims Explained

Recent public notices from constitutional researchers, particularly Anna Maria Riezinger (Anna Von Reitz), have brought attention to claims about "Life Force Value Annuities" and their connection to the British Crown's alleged financial schemes. This article examines these claims and their relevance to constitutional restoration efforts.

What Are Life Force Value Annuities?

According to researchers in the sovereign citizen and American State National movements, "Life Force Value Annuities" are essentially life insurance policies taken out on populations without their knowledge or consent. The claim is that these are the same as traditional life insurance annuities but include "additional resources" - namely, the productive capacity and future earnings of citizens.

The central assertion is that governments have securitized their citizens as collateral for national debts through the birth certificate registration system. When a child is born and a birth certificate is issued, this document allegedly creates a corporate "strawman" identity that can be traded on financial markets.

The $950 Trillion Claim

One of the most striking claims involves Prince Philip allegedly collecting $950 trillion in Life Force Value Annuities in 2017. To put this in perspective:

• Global GDP in 2017 was approximately $80 trillion
• The entire global wealth is estimated at around $400 trillion
• The claimed amount exceeds all global assets combined

Proponents argue this figure represents the accumulated value of life insurance policies on Commonwealth and American citizens over generations, with the payout triggered by various conditions including death.

The Birth Certificate Connection

The theory connects to broader claims about birth certificate fraud:

1. Registration vs. Recording: When a birth is "registered" rather than "recorded," it allegedly transfers ownership of the child to the state
2. Corporate Identity: The ALL CAPS name on government documents represents a corporate entity, not the living person
3. Collateral: This corporate identity serves as collateral for government borrowing
4. Cestui Que Vie Trusts: Each birth certificate allegedly creates a trust account that the government administers

Historical Context

These claims draw on historical precedents:

The Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666

This English law dealt with property rights when a person was presumed dead. Modern interpretations suggest it established a template for treating living people as legally "dead" for administrative purposes.

The Trading With the Enemy Act of 1917

Amended in 1933, this act allegedly classified American citizens as "enemies" of the corporate United States government, enabling their assets to be seized and managed.

The 1933 Bankruptcy

Claims that the United States declared bankruptcy in 1933 and pledged its citizens as collateral to international creditors, particularly the Federal Reserve system.

Connection to Corporate Personhood

These claims connect directly to the corporate personhood fraud exposed in the 1886 Santa Clara County case:

• If corporations can be treated as persons, the inverse may also apply
• Living people may be treated as corporate entities without their knowledge
• This enables their productive capacity to be securitized and traded

The Depopulation Angle

The notice references Prince Philip's infamous statement about wanting to return as a "deadly virus" to address "overpopulation." The implication is that:

• Life insurance annuities pay out upon death
• Mass casualty events would trigger massive payouts
• This creates financial incentives for depopulation

Whether through war or other means, the claim is that the Crown and associated interests benefit financially from population reduction.

Critical Analysis

It's important to approach these claims with discernment:

Supporting Evidence:

• Birth certificates are indeed financial instruments (they have CUSIP numbers)
• Governments do issue bonds backed by future tax revenues (human productivity)
• The Federal Reserve system does create money through debt
• Historical documents support some aspects of these claims

Challenges:

• The $950 trillion figure exceeds all global wealth
• Direct documentary evidence of these specific schemes is limited
• Courts have consistently rejected sovereign citizen arguments
• The complexity of the claims makes verification difficult

Practical Implications

Regardless of the ultimate truth of these claims, they point to legitimate concerns:

1. Lack of Transparency: Government financial operations are often opaque
2. Consent: Citizens rarely understand or consent to how they're governed
3. Corporate Control: The influence of corporate interests on government is well-documented
4. Debt Slavery: National debts do burden future generations

What Can Be Done?

For those concerned about these issues, practical steps include:

1. Status Correction: Filing documents to clarify your political status
2. Oath and Bond Research: Verifying that officials have proper credentials
3. Public Records Requests: Demanding transparency from government agencies
4. Community Organization: Building networks of informed citizens
5. Constitutional Education: Understanding your rights and how to exercise them

Conclusion

The claims about Life Force Value Annuities represent one piece of a larger puzzle concerning the relationship between citizens and their governments. While some claims may seem extraordinary, the underlying concerns about consent, transparency, and accountability are legitimate.

The path forward involves careful research, community building, and systematic use of constitutional remedies - the very tools that the Unalienable Redemption platform provides.

---

This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals.